Archive / Research Analyst / Valuation Principles
nism-series-xv-ev-sales-multiple-loss-making-companies[ RESEARCH ANALYST ]
Under what specific corporate situation is the Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales) multiple the most appropriate relative valuation metric?
[ A ]When evaluating early-stage, high-growth, or cyclical turnaround companies that are temporarily reporting negative operating profits (losses) but have a viable path to long-term profitability.[ CORRECT ]
[ B ]When valuing a mature commercial bank holding 100% of assets in cash deposits.
[ C ]When a company is permanently entering liquidation with zero future sales prospects.
[ D ]When valuing a closed-end sovereign gold bond fund with fixed coupon payments.
Takeaway
Option A is correct: When evaluating early-stage, high-growth, or cyclical turnaround companies that are temporarily reporting negative operating profits (losses) but have a viable path to long-term profitability.
Derivation
Traditional valuation multiples like P/E, EV/EBITDA, and EV/EBIT cannot be computed or are economically meaningless when a company reports negative operating profits or net losses. In such scenarios (e.g., rapidly scaling tech startups, cyclical companies at deep cyclical bottoms, or post-restructuring turnarounds), Revenue/Sales is always positive. The EV/Sales multiple allows relative comparison of market value per rupee of top-line revenue, provided the business possesses a credible roadmap to operating leverage and future profitability. This tests loss-making company valuation. The common error is using P/B for asset-light software startups.
Why the others fail
B — When valuing a mature commercial bank holding 100% of assets in cash deposits.
Commercial banks are financial intermediaries valued using Price-to-Book (P/BV) and Price-to-Adjusted-Book metrics, not EV/Sales.
C — When a company is permanently entering liquidation with zero future sales prospects.
Liquidating companies with no future sales must be valued at Net Realizable Liquidation Value, not revenue multiples.
D — When valuing a closed-end sovereign gold bond fund with fixed coupon payments.
Sovereign gold bonds and debt funds are valued using fixed income yield to maturity (YTM) and bullion spot pricing.
Related questions
nism-series-xv-trailing-vs-forward-pe-exampleResearch Analyst
Trailing PE vs Forward PE: How Do You Calculate Each?nism-series-xv-price-to-book-value-banks-vs-itResearch Analyst
Why Does Price-to-Book Work for Banks but Not IT Firms?nism-series-xv-trading-multiples-vs-transaction-multiplesResearch Analyst
Trading Multiples vs Transaction Multiples: Why the Premium Gap?